insertion. TABLE 1 Summary of resultsV TE PROPHYL A FP Agonist Molecular Weight XISConclusions: The establishment of an MDST for IVCF resulted in a considerable improvement in filter retrieval prices and notable reduction in individuals lost-to-follow-up. These findings support the imple-PB1217|Implementation of a Multidisciplinary Surveillance Team to improve Inferior Vena Cava Filter Retrieval and Outcomes S. Chao1; H. Bortz2; H. Stevens3,4,5; J. McFadyen3,four,five; H. Tran3,mentation of a supervisory group to enhance IVCF monitoring and retrieval to improve patient-centred care.Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; 2Caspase 3 Inducer Storage & Stability Pharmacy Division,PB1218|Comparison of 0.9 Normal Saline (NS) Flush and Unfractionated Heparin (UFH) Flush for Maintenance of Central Venous Catheter Line Patency A.N. Landmesser1,2; R.J. Roberts2; R.P. Rosovsky3,4; M.E. BarraAlfred Wellness, Melbourne, Australia; Clinical Haematology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia; 4Australian Centre for Blood Illnesses, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; 5Atherothrombosis and Vascular Biology Plan, Baker Institute, Melbourne, Australia Background: Inferior vena cava filters (IVCF) are generally used to prevent pulmonary embolism in high risk individuals deemed unsuitable for venous thromboembolism (VTE) chemoprophylaxis, or as adjunct therapy in individuals with established VTE who are unable to receive anticoagulation as a consequence of higher bleeding risk. Even so, insertion of IVCF may perhaps result in important complications such as IVC occlusion or filter embolisation. Hence, timely filter retrieval is important. Aims: To evaluate regardless of whether the introduction of a multidisciplinary surveillance team (MDST) impacts IVCF retrieval rate, time-to-retrieval, filter-related complications, and rate of VTE right after IVCF insertion.Northeastern Univeristy, Boston, United states of america; 2Massachusetts Massachusetts Basic Hospital, Department of Medicine, DivisionGeneral Hospital, Division of Pharmacy, Boston, Usa;of Hematology, Boston, Usa; 4Harvard College of Medicine, Boston, United states Background: Central venous catheters (CVCs), an essential tool generally utilized inside the care of critically ill sufferers, provides access for medication and fluid administration as well as hemodynamic monitoring and diagnostics. To sustain line patency, CVCs are normally flushed with unfractionated heparin (UFH) or 0.9 normal saline (NS). Even so,ABSTRACT893 of|conclusive proof surrounding the optimal CVC upkeep approach is unknown. Throughout a vital heparin shortage in 2019, 0.9 NS became the only CVC flush alternative to sustain line patency at our institution. Aims: To evaluate safety and effectiveness of 0.9 NS versus UFH flush in the maintenance of CVC. Solutions: We conducted a retrospective analysis at a tertiary academic healthcare center of critically ill adult individuals with documented CVC placed for at the very least 72 hours, in between February 2019 and February 2020. The key efficacy outcome was a composite of CVC occlusion, CVC removal due to thrombosis, or intracatheter alteplase administration. The secondary security outcomes incorporated significant and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB). Data was extracted in the electronic well being record, as well as the final results have been analyzed utilizing JMPPro 15 (SAS Institute Inc.) computer software. Outcomes: Five hundred consecutive individuals have been analyzed consisting of 250 sufferers in every cohort. Among the whole cohort 275 patients were male, median age was 62.two years [51.02.6], median length of stay within the intens
