Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) concentrations and liver function biomarkers inside a population
Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) concentrations and liver function biomarkers within a FGFR3 Synonyms population with elevated PFOA exposure,” Environmental Overall health Perspectives, vol. 120, no. five, pp. 65560, 2012. N. Kudo and Y. Kawashima, “Toxicity and toxicokinetics of perfluorooctanoic acid in humans and animals,” Journal of Toxicological Sciences, vol. 28, no. two, pp. 497, 2003. L. Cui, Q.-F. Zhou, C.-Y. Liao, J.-J. Fu, and G.-B. Jiang, “Studies on the toxicological effects of PFOA and PFOS on rats employing histological observation and chemical analysis,” Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, vol. 56, no. two, pp. 33849, 2009. L. M. Eldasher, X. Wen, M. S. Tiny, K. M. Bircsak, L. L. Yacovino, and L. M. Aleksunes, “Hepatic and renal Bcrp transporter expression in mice treated with perfluorooctanoic acid,” Toxicology, vol. 306, no. 4, pp. 10813, 2013. A. G. Abdellatif, V. Preat, H. S. Taper, and M. Roberfroid, “The modulation of rat liver carcinogenesis by perfluorooctanoic acid, a peroxisome proliferator,” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, vol. 111, no. 3, pp. 53037, 1991. V. Bindhumol, K. C. Chitra, and P. P. Mathur, “Bisphenol A induces reactive oxygen species generation inside the liver of male rats,” Toxicology, vol. 188, no. 2-3, pp. 11724, 2003. D. Bagchi, J. Balmoori, M. Bagchi, X. Ye, C. B. Williams, and S. J. Stohs, “Comparative effects of TCDD, endrin, naphthalene and chromium (VI) on oxidative strain and tissue harm inside the liver and brain tissues of mice,” Toxicology, vol. 175, no. 1, pp. 732, 2002. A. P. Senft, T. P. Dalton, D. W. Nebert, M. B. Genter, R. J. Hutchinson, and H. G. Shertzer, “Dioxin increases reactive[12]Conflict of InterestsThe authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.[13]AcknowledgmentsThis study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 81060056) and Jiangxi Provincial Education Improvement (no. GJJ12083).[14][15]
NIH Public AccessAuthor ManuscriptBiochim Biophys Acta. Author manuscript; offered in PMC 2015 January 01.Published in final edited kind as: Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014 January ; 1843(1): . doi:ten.1016j.bbamcr.2013.06.027.NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author ManuscriptRegulation of Proteolysis by Human Deubiquitinating EnzymesZiad M. Eletr and Keith D. Wilkinson Division of Biochemistry, Emory University, Atlanta GAAbstractThe post-translational attachment of one particular or a number of ubiquitin molecules to a protein generates many different targeting signals which can be used in several distinct approaches inside the cell. Ubiquitination can alter the activity, localization, protein-protein interactions or stability with the targeted protein. Additional, a very huge number of proteins are topic to regulation by ubiquitin-dependent processes, which means that practically all cellular functions are impacted by these pathways. Nearly a hundred enzymes from 5 unique gene households (the deubiquitinating enzymes or DUBs), reverse this modification by hydrolyzing the (iso)peptide bond tethering ubiquitin to itself or the target protein. 4 of those households are thiol proteases and 1 is really a metalloprotease. DUBs of your Ubiquitin C-terminal Hydrolase (UCH) household act on little molecule adducts of ubiquitin, approach the ubiquitin proprotein, and trim ubiquitin from the distal finish of a polyubiquitin chain. Ubiquitin Particular Proteases (USP) are inclined to ERK8 Accession recognize and encounter their substrates by interaction of the variable regions of their sequence with all the substrate protei.
