Le computation provided an identical boundary or pretty related boundary situations. boundary conditions.DBCO-NHS ester Epigenetic Reader Domain Figure 6. Windowed simulation comparison on the radiative intensity along the Z lines (X (X0.five,0.5, simulation comparison on the radiative intensity along the Z lines = = Y Figure six. Figure six. Windowed simulationfor RT-LBM, of our MC model, plus the MC modellines (X =fromY et al. al. (2020). = 0.5, 0.75, 0.88) comparison our MC model, plus the along the (MCM) from Mink Y = 0.5, 0.75, 0.88) for RT-LBM, the radiative intensityMC modelZ (MCM) 0.five, Mink et (2020). = 0.5, 0.75, 0.88)The RT-LBM, our MC model, aa= 0.9, bb= 2. model (MCM) from Mink et al. (2020). for radiative parameters are = the = two. Theradiative parameters are and0.9, MC The radiative parameters are a = 0.9, b = two.Atmosphere 2021, 12, 1316 Atmosphere 2021, 12, x FOR PEER Evaluation Atmosphere 2021, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW9 of 14 9 of of 15 9Figure 7. Unique window size effects the direct solar radiation intensity. The major row are Figure 7. 7. Various window size effects on the direct solar radiation intensity. The top rated row are from Figure Different window size effects onon the direct solar radiation intensity. The prime row are Lesogaberan Purity RT-LBM simulations. The bottom row are are from model simulations. The The radiative paramfrom RT-LBM simulations. The bottom row from MC MC model simulations. radiative parameters are from RT-LBM simulations. The bottom row are from MC model simulations. The radiative parama = 0.five, 0.1. eters are ab==0.5, b = 0.1. eters are a = 0.5, b = 0.1.Figure 8. eight. oblique incoming solar direct beam radiation simulation case. Comparisonof in the radiaFigure Oblique incoming solar direct beam radiation simulation case. Comparison ofthe radiadirect beam radiation simulation case. Comparison the radiative Figure eight. Oblique tive intensity at at cross section at Y = 0.5.=forfor RT-LBM along with the MC model. The radiative parametive intensity X-Z cross section at at = 0.5. RT-LBM along with the MC model. The radiative parameters are intensity at X-Z X-Z cross section Y Y 0.five. for RT-LBM plus the MC model. The radiative parameters = 0.5, = 0.five, b = 0.1. ters are b = 0.1. b = 0.1. a are a a = 0.5,Another situation, ofof solar direct beam radiation oblique towards the level ground surface, An additional circumstance, of solar direct beam radiation oblique for the level ground surface, Another scenario, solar direct beam radiation oblique to the level ground surface, is is simulated. The atmospheric optical parameters of clean air (a (a = 0.5, = = 0.1) predicament simulated. The atmospheric optical parameters of a is simulated. The atmospheric optical parameters of a clean air = 0.five, b b 0.1) scenario had been used. The motivation for this simulation was toto look into no matter whether direct solar radialook into no matter if direct solar radiwere employed. The motivation for this simulation was to look into whether direct solar radiation decreases when the solar ray isis not perpendicular to the major boundary surface. The ationdecreases when the solar ray is not perpendicular for the major boundary surface. decreases when the solar ray not perpendicular to the best boundary surface. The tion incoming solar zenith angle was set toto 45from the west plus the incoming direct solar incoming solar zenith angle was set to 45from the west plus the incoming direct solar incoming solar zenith angle was set 45 from radiative intensity was set toto one. The RT-LBM and MC simulations compare reasonably radiative intensity was set to one. The RT-L.
